I took a bath this evening, which I tend to do when I have a free hour and I smell bad.
And when I bathe I often bring a friend. Tonight it was Albert Camus and his Plague. In this book, plague is not a metaphor. It is a literal plague. Pus, sores, buboes, death. The town now is under quarantine -- no one comes in, no one gets out.
At some point during any story about an epidemic, there needs to be a horribly self-righteous preacher who proclaims the current calamity as God's punishment on the wicked. The chapter I read in the bath included just such a character. Imagine Pat Robertson in a 1950s French Village.
One thought that came to mind after I read this chapter was how there really aren't as many prominent, national, religious figures these days who make outrageous claims of this nature. I know that's not an empirical statement, and I know there are plenty of people out there who think this way. But it seems like that, as a nation, we are quick to point out how absolutely ridiculous it is when Pat Robertson or others make these kinds of statements. We respond quickly because it's offensive and mean-spirited. To proclaim the suffering of others to be self-inflicted is just cruel. God causes bad things happen to bad people because of their bad deeds. The Pat Robertson doctrine, in a nutshell. If a bad thing happened, it's because God caused it in response to your bad deeds.
But do we find the converse situation to be similarly offensive? God causes good things happen to good people because of their good deeds. If a good thing happened, it's because God caused it in response to your good deeds. If you know me, you know that I've spent a long time thinking about this issue. I even wrote my senior paper on it. And the problem is: I don't think you can truly believe the second statement without also agreeing with the first. The second statement is agreeable, generally, because it's about people getting what they deserve in a good way. The first is mean because it's about people getting what they deserve in a punitive, final, and disproportionate way.
Anyways, I was thinking about this again today.
-Mike